Hi,

Le 2025-03-09 00:23, Philip Hands a écrit :

From my reading of this thread, the only real consensus seems to be that
format=flowed is a good idea (as a result of which I intend to persuade
my mail setup to generate that when I've got a moment).

I doubt that a GR is justified, especially if all it's going to end up
doing is adding a recommendation for format=flowed to the CoC that isn't
actually required for people to adopt the use of format=flowed.

I'm seconding this. f=f is the way to go here, and has been so for about the last 27 years [1] [2] [3] [4] in non-top-posting communities even though it's slow to ramp up, a bit like IPv6.

Cheers,


[1]: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-822/a0d-rShA_HPKGTgFGoeF2cAZ0VQ/ [2]: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-822/kgX69yZ2aTb5HNkb4HEL4gAykx4/ [3]: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-822/7AZtGBeahWk_eHpJk9NS6kG-PrU/ [4]: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-822/tFodnoYUlXNMmLB40bIjhoMQpnY/

--
Julien Plissonneau Duquène

Reply via email to