> > > In this case, if somebody has the knowledge to build their own 2.1 kernel > > > (since one didn't come on the CD), then they have the knowledge necessary > > > to get packages from "unstable". > > > > It's very unpleasant to have to download things whn you have just bought a > > CD. And many users are forced to use new kernels because of their new > > hardware drivers. > > These package are already a working feature of hamm... why would we remove > > it? > > The 2.1 kernel is not part of Hamm and so these packages are _not_ a working > feature of Hamm.
I wouldn't say that "ready for 2.1 kernels" isn't a desirable feature... Debian 2.0 stable will be here for a while and remember that 2.1.x kernels are starting some kind of code freeze time... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
