Quoting Thomas Goirand (2021-02-09 20:48:12)
> On 2/9/21 6:21 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 01:55:19PM +0000, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> >> * Whether or not contributors can feel free to reformat
> >> files (e.g. wrap-and-sort -a -v).
> >> ("allow-reformatting" in lintian-brush.conf)
> >
> > On this, please also read https://bugs.debian.org/895570#13
> >
> > tl;dr: I honestly believe we should just decide on a format, and
> > converge towards it.
> > It apparently works quite well for python as a whole ecosystem, where
> > now pretty much nobody is "against" pep8 (or even black!). There is no
> > reason we can't manage to decide on a wrapping format and stick with it.
>
> I've been flamed a few times for (ab)using wrap-and-sort in some teams,
> I do believe it's not justified. Sometimes, it's up to a point one can
> hardly read the dependency list...Tools like wrap-and-sort are certainly a no-go for NMUs! Yes, it is harder for me to read packages not maintained in _my_ style, but really I have *no* say on styling when only a quest making changes to a package maintained by someone else. If a package is too hard for me to help edit, then that is a reason so not NMU that package, not a reason to re-style the package! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
