On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 09:39:51AM +0900, Marc Dequènes (duck) wrote: > Quack, > > It seems the project is leaving the decision about Weboob onto me, so I'll > try to address it. > > The diversity statement tells me we should welcome others even if they are > very different and with conflicting opinions but nothing beyond that. There > is no policy part that I found helpful. > I discarded heated reaction from the thread of discussion to isolate the > most constructive remarks. > > We've been able to draft guidelines about what we consider not acceptable at > events and called this "code of conduct". This does not need to be universal > but in our community we were able to agree on some criteria and I think this > is making our world better. I don't think we should write an infinite list > of rules but guidelines based on non-emotional objective points to consider. > > There was part of the discussion about the intent of these upstream authors, > but we're not mind reader and in the end the impact on people, and solving > this if we can, is more important than judging people. > > I've also excluded any consideration about the usefulness of this software. > As long as one single DD is willing to maintain a software it is fine being > in according to the policy. Also being very useful does not grant any > special allowance to be nasty. > > So I've considered these criteria: > > 1) is it insulting? > There was an insult targeting homosexuals, but a contributor proposed a fix > and upstream accepted it without discussion.
but... https://git.weboob.org/weboob/devel/merge_requests/232 Mike
