On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 11:45:23 +0100, Samuel Thibault <sthiba...@debian.org> wrote: >Marc Haber, on Sun 13 Nov 2016 11:37:13 +0100, wrote: >> On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 13:06:33 +0200, Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi> wrote: >> >I'm even willing to justify my opinion: Keeping testing in a state >> >that can be released seems to be the only way in which we can make a >> >release in a reasonable time frame. We've tried several other >> >approaches, which haven't worked. The approach of "let's freeze and >> >then try to fix things" didn't work. Let's not try it again. >> >> I do not think that it is a service to our users to release an >> incomplete distribution just for the sake of keeping a date. > >As said above, it's *not* a matter of "keeping a date", but "getting >something out at all within reasonable time".
This means that we didn't to this with squeeze, wheezy and jessie. In fact, we were in a so reasonable time frame for those three releases that I have seen installations moving away from Debian because we keep releasing too often. Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
