On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 13:06:33 +0200, Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi> wrote: >I'm even willing to justify my opinion: Keeping testing in a state >that can be released seems to be the only way in which we can make a >release in a reasonable time frame. We've tried several other >approaches, which haven't worked. The approach of "let's freeze and >then try to fix things" didn't work. Let's not try it again.
I do not think that it is a service to our users to release an incomplete distribution just for the sake of keeping a date. Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
