Matthias Klose: > On 03.04.2016 12:12, Niels Thykier wrote: >> Hi, >> >> With the latest debhelper upload today, I believe compat 10 is now ready >> for widespread testing. > > please could you consider generating new style dbg files (using > build-id) for every debhelper compat level, if a binary file has a > build-id? The trigger should be the build-id, not the debhelper compat > level. > > Thanks, Matthias >
I do not mind managing a mass-bug filing for removing manual dbg
packages without reverse dependencies if that is any help. Beyond mostly
solving your request (eventually) it would also:
* reduce the number of binary packages considerably in unstable
- including reducing the metadata and mirror sizes
* A quick'n'dirty apt cache searchs suggest we got 2.1k -dbg packages
without rdeps[1].
- This is in the ballpark of 5-10% of all (binary) packages on amd64.
- The method (being "quick'n'dirty") ignores a couple of "convenient"
things like "not every one using debhelper" or "named -dbg but
actually just a transitional package to support upgrades" etc.
This is of course assuming people think it is a good idea and that the
"detection" is sufficient (or can trivially be improved).
* Please keep in mind that this would be an iterative bug filing.
- As -dbg packages are removed others will lose their last rdep.
Thanks,
~Niels
[1] And by "quick'n'dirty', I meant horribly slow - anyway, method is
basically:
for pkg in $(aptitude search dbg | grep -v ^v |
awk '$2 ~ /-dbg$/ { print $2 }') ; do
if [ $(apt-cache rdepends $pkg | wc -l) -lt 3 ] ; then
echo $pkg ;
fi ;
done | uniq
(Yeah, the grep is probably redundant when I am also using awk - please
forgive my obvious lack of "awk-fu")
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
