Hi Ian, On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 03:51:59PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: [..snip..] > I don't think the number of git-based workflows is going to decrease. > I'm hoping (betting!) that the proportion of packages whose git > maintainers' git workflows involve strange[1] git trees will go down. > > [1] Strange means any tree which you can't work on, immediately, with > git, without using some special tool on it first.
Having patches applied with 3.0(quilt) calls out for sync problems between your git tree and debian/patches/. This can be mitigated with --single-debian-patch --auto-commit but that's not what most people mean when talking about 3.0(quilt) - and it kind of defeats it's purpose. It would IMHO be better to have a true git based format then. Cheers, -- Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150731074444.gb3...@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org
