On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 14:56:33 +0200, Vincent Bernat <ber...@debian.org> wrote: > ? 30 juillet 2015 11:54 +0100, Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> : > >>> > Do your published git branches contain the patches-applied or >>> > patches-unapplied tree ? >>> >>> Without using "gbp pq", the published git branches are patches-unapplied >>> trees. >> >> Then to use dgit push, you must use gbp pq. >> >> Do you see why this is necessary, when the purpose is to provide a git >> tree which is useful to someone who doesn't want to learn about your >> specific patch system and workflow ? > >On the other hand, since the previous workflow was quilt, still using >quilt is useful for someone who doesn't want to learn about specific git >workflows.
Agreed. Additionally, my git/gbp workflow has blown up numerous times with the patches applied. Since switching to patches unapplied, things are just fine. >Personally, I am waiting for the number of git-based workflows to >decrease before settling for something else. Agreed. It's a real pain to have a new workflow twice for each stable release, it's killing valueable time and makes backporting a double pain. Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1zkrzj-0008tn...@swivel.zugschlus.de
