On 21/06/15 10:39, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-06-19 at 16:37 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Hideki Yamane <henr...@debian.or.jp> wrote:
>> Which is suitable "distribution" in changelog for Jessie and wheezy
>> point release? (and why) I just looked debian-release posts and
>> confused...
>>
>> - stable / oldstable
>> - stable-proposed-updates / oldstable-proposed-updates
>> - jessie / wheezy
>>
>> The recommended distribution is the codename (jessie, wheezy). This way
>> there can be no confusion.
>
> That's what I would have thought, but:
>
> $ dch -r -D jessie
> dch warning: Recognised distributions are: unstable, testing, stable,
> oldstable, experimental,
> {testing-,stable-,oldstable-,}proposed-updates,
> {testing,stable,oldstable}-security, wheezy-backports,
> jessie-backports and UNRELEASED.
> Using your request anyway.
> dch: Did you see that warning? Press RETURN to continue...
>
> I don't see any bugs about not accepting Jessie here and if it weren't
> deliberate I'd expect older releases to be listed (i.e. it's not just
> that devscripts hadn't caught up with Jessie yet).
Then please file a bug.
Cheers,
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55872911.4070...@debian.org
