On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 09:39:48PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > > Hi. You assert that even for leaf packages we should not make changes > > > in unstable targeted beyond jessie. I can see an argument for that > > > prior to the important bug deadline. However, past that point, I don't > > > see value in avoiding changes to leaf packages in unstable, and I'd like > > > to understand why you'd encourage folks to do so. > > What if an RC bug gets discovered in the package? > > Who has been a naughty boy this year and hadn't read the Jessie > freeze-policy? > > https://release.debian.org/jessie/freeze_policy.html I did read it.
> > If the version in unstable has significant changes that cannot be reversed > > or stuck behind other packages that are not acceptable, please contact the > > release team (i.e. file a bug) for doing your upload to > > testing-proposed-updates. However, please remember that stricter rules > > apply to testing-proposed-updates (see here for the rules.) As already noted in another email, using TPU is worse than the usual way. -- WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
