>>>>> "Didier" == Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <o...@debian.org> writes:
Didier> (Snipping others' parts, and moving to -devel)
Didier> Given the (current) small exposure of
Didier> testing-proposed-updates (aka the repository has very few
Didier> users, therefore the packages there get very few testing),
Didier> unstable is supposed to stay the anti-chamber of testing,
Didier> mostly at all times: whatever you upload to unstable should
Didier> be aimed at the next stable release.
Didier> None of this changes during freezes, where unstable should
Didier> only have changes targeted at testing (and therefore,
Didier> currently, at jessie).Using experimental for new upstream
Didier> versions is not at all an abuse; it's exactly the suite one
Didier> should be targeting for these changes!
Hi. You assert that even for leaf packages we should not make changes
in unstable targeted beyond jessie. I can see an argument for that
prior to the important bug deadline. However, past that point, I don't
see value in avoiding changes to leaf packages in unstable, and I'd like
to understand why you'd encourage folks to do so.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/0000014a10cbc472-29dc8d30-4bb5-45e6-9208-375ae7937fff-000...@email.amazonses.com
