On Sat, 2014-11-29 at 20:27 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 06:33:44PM +0000, Ivan Shmakov wrote: > > >>>>> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> writes: > > > > […] > > > > > The second part, making systemd portable, has already been widely > > > discussed. There are significant technical reasons why systemd is > > > Linux only. And the potential "recepients", like BSD, don't seem to > > > be interested anyway. > > > > Unless I be mistaken, that also /does/ mean Debian. That is: > > Debian GNU/kFreeBSD and Debian GNU/Hurd. > Yes, the technical reasons apply. The other reasons apply too, I think: > /kFreeBSD and /Hurd ports are interested in staying close to their > upstream projects and certainly don't have the manpower to take on > systemd porting on their own. > > > Sorry for jumping into this discussion without any thorough > > reading, but I have mentioned this point a few times already at > > (other) mailing lists and on IRC, so if I got it wrong, I’d like > > to be corrected, so that I won’t spread confusion any further. > Please don't do that. Those threads are long enough already, without > rehashing things which can be googled in 30s.
The best for kFreeBSD and Hurd would be to abandoning the Debian ship. It is sinking :( (just let the devuan people get things in order first) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1417290209.6826.9.ca...@gmail.com
