On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 06:33:44PM +0000, Ivan Shmakov wrote: > >>>>> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> writes: > > […] > > > The second part, making systemd portable, has already been widely > > discussed. There are significant technical reasons why systemd is > > Linux only. And the potential "recepients", like BSD, don't seem to > > be interested anyway. > > Unless I be mistaken, that also /does/ mean Debian. That is: > Debian GNU/kFreeBSD and Debian GNU/Hurd. Yes, the technical reasons apply. The other reasons apply too, I think: /kFreeBSD and /Hurd ports are interested in staying close to their upstream projects and certainly don't have the manpower to take on systemd porting on their own.
> Sorry for jumping into this discussion without any thorough > reading, but I have mentioned this point a few times already at > (other) mailing lists and on IRC, so if I got it wrong, I’d like > to be corrected, so that I won’t spread confusion any further. Please don't do that. Those threads are long enough already, without rehashing things which can be googled in 30s. Zbyszek > FSF associate member #7257 http://boycottsystemd.org/ … 3013 B6A0 230E 334A Ah, you're not really looking for answers. Why didn't you put that in a more visible place, and not in the footer so I only see it after writing a response? [A purely rhetorical question, no need to answer.] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141129192713.gc23...@in.waw.pl
