On 19/11/14 21:32, Steve Langasek wrote: >> 1) the problem with new feature in systemd which considers all >> filesystems in fstab vital for system boot and stops boot if they >> fail. It's been decided that although it is a change in behaviour >> that might render some systems unbootable it's technically correct >> implementation and only enforces that non-vital filesystems are >> marked as such in fstab which should have been the case from the >> start. >> > As regards the two issues you've described: the first is not a bug. > It's a necessary change in how we view the boot in a truly > event-driven system. There is no sane default policy for how to > interpret entries in /etc/fstab on upgrade except to regard them as > all mandatory - *but* it's important that the admin be given the > opportunity to intervene to override this policy.
Question: is it safe to say that systemd doesn't yet support the full /etc/fstab specification from util-linux [1]? [1] man 5 fstab Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/546e6113.2010...@alvarezp.ods.org
