Hi, >> Really, if all the energy that people put into complaining about systemd >> and looking for proves to back their complaints (many of which are >> certainly valid!) would be put into providing alternative >> implementations of these interfaces that many desktop environments say > > I *have* alternative implementations in the environment > on my Debian desktop: > > • X (well, XFree86 in MirBSD…) > • evilwm (laptop) / icewm (desktop) > • uxterm > • screen > • mksh > • jupp > • alpine > • openntpd > • inetutils-syslogd (currently)
I was specifically talking about interfaces (as in, dbus signatures), not features. That would deal with the GNOME dependencies, which your alternatives do not. > So, no need for anything systemd-ish. Well, even better for you :) . Then you are even less affected by what the git commit you referenced announces, than I am. Kind regards Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54663576.8030...@ralfj.de
