Hi,

>> How does having yet another NTP client shut off existing NTP clients?
> 
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/7b8b9686e050a2b19ed2a3686af187dffaab5c08

What do you think this commit does/announces? This is about removing
support from timedatectl to control other NTP clients. If you never used
"timedatectl set-ntp", this doesn't affect you at all.
This is not about removing support from systemd to start other NTP
services. "apt-get install ntpd" will continue to function to matter
what. Neither is it removing support for alternative implementations of
the timedated interface doing whatever they want.
There's obviously a con to such a change, but there's also a clear pro
from the maintenance perspective: less combinations to test.

So I stand by my question: How does adding yet another NTP client, (and
an implementation of a simple dbus interface that's tied to this
client), shut off existing NTP clients?

You may loose some of the desktop integration, but from your reaction to
the integration systemd is providing, that doesn't seem like it disturbs
you. And even that is only true until someone goes ahead and
re-implements the timedated interface.

Really, if all the energy that people put into complaining about systemd
and looking for proves to back their complaints (many of which are
certainly valid!) would be put into providing alternative
implementations of these interfaces that many desktop environments say
are really useful to them, the discussion could long be over. Nobody is
saying that implementing the logind interface is easy, but it's
certainly more sustainable than implementing the systemd-internal
interfaces systemd-logind is using, and running logind on top of that
(which, as far as I know [1], systemd-shim does). I've yet to see a
technical complaint about the *interfaces*, and that's really all Gnome
(and others) depend on.

[1]
<http://homepage.ntlworld.com./jonathan.deboynepollard/FGA/debian-systemd-packaging-hoo-hah.html>

Kind regards
Ralf


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/546620a2.4060...@ralfj.de

Reply via email to