On 07/16/2014 10:06 PM, Harald Dunkel wrote: > On 07/16/14 15:17, Holger Levsen wrote: >> >> Especially if the NMU is properly done (eg documented in the BTS, uploaded >> to >> DELAYED-foo, etc) I've hardly seen any complaints in recent years. >> > > Surely I could have done better in providing a "clean" > fix to #741415, making it more easy for the Debian folks > to create an NMU. Sorry. I have included a real patch > in the bug report today. > > I also tried to set the "patch" tag, but its not clear if > this succeeded. > > > Hope this helps > Harri
Hi, To try to kill your frustration, I have sponsored the upload of your fix to the delayed/10 queue. If everything goes well, then in 15 days, network-manager-strongswan will be back in Jessie. BTW, it feels weird that the package build-depends on debhelper when it really is using CDBS. The debian/copyright is also quite wrong, as it doesn't include the copyright notice for the GPL v2 (and I believe that's mandatory, right?). Not commenting on the fact that it's still using the format 1.0 without debian/source/format file, etc. In other words, I agree that this package is in the need for a bit more care. I hope this helps, Thomas Goirand (zigo) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53c6a0ba.7010...@debian.org
