On 01/07/14, 05:35pm, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > >> gentle persuasion [...] is more in line with point 4 of the Debian > >> Social Contract than [...] bullying? > > > May I suggest that you treat others the way you want to be treated? > > I am not a Debian Developer. I am not bound by the Social Contract.
FYI, you are bound to https://www.debian.org/code_of_conduct. The reason why that document exists is because the Social Contract has barely something about behaviour. > > Are we to expect a higher standard of behaviour from a Debian Developer > than from a random user who is pissed off because his system has just been > broken? Or is being a Debian Developer power without responsibility, as > some of your esteemed colleagues appear to believe? Either Debian Developer or a regular user who's pissed of or happy, we expect the same higher standard. CoC applies to everyone. > > > The suggestion to just add conflicts is also not quite helpful. > > I'm not sure I'm following. There was no reason whatsoever to install > systemd on my system, yet it got installed and broke the ACPI scripts. To > my untrained eyes, it looks like a conflict is missing somewhere. Knowing what exactly installed systemd in your system should be helpful. It's not like systemd got installed by itself without being a dependency of another package. Kind regards. -- Jose Luis Rivas | ghostbar The Debian Project → <http://www.debian.org> GPG D278 F9C1 5E54 61AA 3C1E 2FCD 13EC 43EE B9AC 8C43
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
