On 2014-07-01, Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> wrote: > The question is which of these is a worse outcome for the jessie release. I > come down firmly on the side that breaking desktops on upgrade is a worse > outcome than being behind on the latest and greatest user session interface= > s.
We already have broken desktops-on-upgrade with current systemd-shim in the archive. And it is even broken after reboot. It might be bugs in the desktop related packages, but it is also a very low priority one. Also, post-upgrade-pre-reboot systems has had issues since forever, and I think even the upgrade notes recommends to not dist-upgrade from within X. So, where do we want to put our resources? Improving the actual experience once fully upgraded and rebooted? Or ensure a better experience when in the middle of the upgrade and not yet rebooted? I know where I would put the resources I can allocate. /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/lov38o$2ah$1...@ger.gmane.org