On 06/21/2014 01:03 AM, Neil McGovern wrote: > On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 12:49:52AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> So, do I understand well that it's your view that just linking with >> AGPLv3 make it mandatory to re-license using AGPLv3? Is there such a >> clause in the AGPLv3 license? >> > > No, it's required to re-licence it to AGPLv3, or an AGPLv3 compatable > licence. See, for example, > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#IfLibraryIsGPL and > https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html > > Neil
Thank you, it makes sense now. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53a5b3a1.8010...@debian.org
