On Fri, 14 Feb 2014, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > I'm not sure I understand why. Debian and Ubuntu have been using > different init systems for some time now, with Ubuntu on upstart and > Debian on sysvinit. Why should our change of defaults really matter to > them, when they weren't using our default anyway? > > Or might they be resigned to the "tight coupling" that Ian Jackson is so > worried about? As Debian becomes more tightly bound to systemd, using > something else may prove increasingly difficult.
Well, it is difficult to second-guess Shuttelworth, but the "tight coupling" is likely to be part of it. This was a non-issue with sysvinit (for Debian) and upstart (for Ubuntu), but with systemd we will have to get involved upstream. Debian and Ubuntu together have enough weight to affect systemd development somewhat, and more imporantly, enough resources to permanently maintain a fork should that ever become necessary (I have no reasons to belive it will happen, and I don't count minor distro-specific changes as a fork). -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140215150926.gc5...@khazad-dum.debian.net
