Hi there! On Sat, 04 Jan 2014 04:29:02 +0100, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 08:59:53AM -0600, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: >> > So your doomsday scenario is that if you license something >> > GPLv2+, someone might fork and modify it to be GPLv3+, >> >> I was under the impression that forks couldn't change licenses. Is the >> scenario which Clint describes (legally) possible? > > I drew up this table a few weeks back when someone was misunderstanding > the GPL combination stuff. > / > | HELPFUL GPL UPGRADE TABLE
Without checking in details Paul's table, upstream FAQ contains a commented matrix where copying and usage are separate (as it should): <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AllCompatibility> Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
