On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 03:50:06AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote: > Apart from the termination clause, the GPLv2 is far more concise, > I don't see tivoization as a problem (it's the software I want to > protect, not anyone's combination of it with hardware), nor do I care > about compatibility with Apache 2.0 -- I do, however, care about > compatibility with GPL v2, which GPL v3 isn't.
So your doomsday scenario is that if you license something GPLv2+, someone might fork and modify it to be GPLv3+, and then someone else with a different doomsday scenario can't incorporate those modifications into GPLv2-only software? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131231145450.ga20...@scru.org
