> I'll say no > more to prevent the usual "Turing Complete" bullshit argument popping > up but as complex as you choose is a good thing.
And I forgot to say you can choose to make the Linux kernel as simple or complex as you like so taht's another falsity that he should have allowed comments to contradict on his myths page. Much effort has been made to do so and I hope it stays that way or we won't see debian and Linux on the toasters of the future like we can have Linux today. No matter the responses, you will be glad to hear! ;-) I am switching off now from these threads as I can't afford the time and no-one needs a repeat of this. -- _______________________________________________________________________ 'Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work together. Write programs to handle text streams, because that is a universal interface' (Doug McIlroy) In Other Words - Don't design like polkit or systemd _______________________________________________________________________ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/262261.86316...@smtp138.mail.ir2.yahoo.com
