Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes: > I should also mention a non-goal:
> * I have no plans to support a workflow where dgit's git tree > contains different contents to the source packages. > My view is that the source code is the source code. If something > is not needed for [d]git users then it is not needed in the Debian > soure package either; conversely if you need to put something in > the Debian source package then by definition it is source code and > should be in your vcs too. > Furthermore, because dgit's need to bidirectionally gateway between > git and the archive, it is difficult for dgit to do this properly. > For example, if there are files in the source package that weren't > in the last git commit pushed with dgit, then the git trees > synthesised by dgit from source package (which dgit fetch/clone > makes when the last upload was not done with dgit) would contain > those files. So the files would seem to have been created by the > non-dgit-using upload. I believe, if I understand this correctly, this will cause problems for the use of local-options and local-patch-header to set single-debian-patch for maintainer uploads. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87mwnbmo57....@windlord.stanford.edu
