Marc Haber <mh+debian-de...@zugschlus.de> writes: > Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> wrote:
>> (The shading of meaning between those two options could be clearer. I >> took it as a measure of enthusiasm and personally answered "I welcome >> systemd in Debian" because, regardless of whether it becomes the >> default, I'm happy to provide systemd unit files for my packages. > Would you also be happy to test and support both systemd unit files > _and_ init scripts? I'm happy to provide both, integrate patches, etc., although I think init scripts are awful and my level of personal motivation to work on init scripts compared to anything else (whether it be systemd or upstart or whatever else someone might invent) is quite low. I expect that as soon as we have a fully supported init system in Debian that supports a sane daemon configuration syntax instead of a mass of unreadable shell code, I will switch all of my systems to it and never look back. Therefore, I can't promise testing of init scripts going forward, but I'm certainly not going to stand in the way of anyone who wants to maintain them and contribute improvements. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8738t5n3yg....@windlord.stanford.edu
