On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 04:21 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 05/23/2013 03:15 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > I have the (possibly wrong) impression that OpenRC is less advanced > > technically than systemd and upstart, and lacks many of their advantages > > For example, according to https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391945 > > which is linked from > > http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Talk:Comparison_of_init_systems, parallel > > boot does not work due to problems in dependency handling. > > I don't think that taking any random bug (which is a "can", not > "always") is fair. > > > I also understand that OpenRC does not replace sysvinit, but instead > > is an additional layer on top of it (for example, sysvinit stays PID 1). > > I believe that is a very strong thing in *favor* of OpenRC.
What is the status of packaging OpenRC for Debian? Is there a group doing that, is help needed? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1369376389.27914.20.ca...@g3620.my.own.domain
