Le 21/11/2012 17:48, Ian Jackson a écrit : >> Although I'd agree that defining a new lv2-plugin would not be needed, >> making LV2 plugins packages Depend/Recommend a generic lv2-host >> package would seriously help as it allows maintainers to avoid to fill >> up Depends: fields with long and incomplete list of all the LV2 hosts >> available in Debian. > > What I'm missing is why it's useful to list lv2 hosts in the Depends > like this. The user will end up with one selected essentially at > random. Is that desirable ?
Usually, the Enhances: relationship is a better one than a Depends:/ Recommends:/Suggests: in plugin packages. Vincent -- Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0x9D025E87 vdanj...@debian.org GPG key fingerprint: FC95 08A6 854D DB48 4B9A 8A94 0BF7 7867 9D02 5E87 Unofficial pkgs: http://moais.imag.fr/membres/vincent.danjean/deb.html APT repo: deb http://people.debian.org/~vdanjean/debian unstable main -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50adc78f....@free.fr
