Jonas Smedegaard writes ("Re: New virtual packages: lv2-plugin and lv2-host"): > It seems to me that you are applying more strict rules now than has been > applied to other names on the list in the past.
This is not some kind of hazing ritual where people have to persuade a reluctant audience. I'm just trying to make sure that we understand what these virtual package names are for. And past decisions are not necessarily a good guide in a relatively lightweight process like this one. Do users specifically find LV2 plugin packages by name and install them ? How does it help the user to have an arbitrary "lv2-host" installed too ? Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20652.53969.639282.165...@chiark.greenend.org.uk