On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 21:09 +0200, Uoti Urpala wrote: > Guillem Jover wrote: ... > I think it's quite arrogant of BSD users to expect others to work to > support their systems. The BSD userbase is small enough that most > projects have alternative things to work on that help a lot more people > than BSD support would. Trying to support extra platforms the > maintainers themselves never use does have a real negative effect on the > rest of a project.
Give it or take it, BSD _is_ in Debian (and Hurd is coming too) ! Maybe this is a question for the DPL. > > Something to remember is that > > GNU/Linux has not always been as dominant as today, and these things > > always change, given time. Very true! > I think the fundamental problem is having kFreeBSD in Debian. It's too > much extra work and problems for limited benefit to a small number of > people. Holding things hostage with "you have to make this work on > kFreeBSD too or it won't be allowed at all" arguments will have negative > effects beyond just init systems. Then you are not talking about Debian. Do you want to create your own distribution? Feel free to do that:) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1330124931.2747.10.camel@x60
