Bernhard R. Link wrote: > * Tollef Fog Heen <tfh...@err.no> [110924 16:16]: > > I find reviewing what's changed between two arbitrary versions in git > > much easier than doing the same with debian source packages, so I think > > it's pretty clear this is a matter of preference. > > But if it is some other version control system, which is easier then?
Arguing against the developer's/maintainer's freedom of choice based on a "feeling" about the learning curve imposed on an intangible group of future contributors is faulty. People that really want to contribute will simply take the time and effort to learn. If they aren't able to sufficiently educate themselves, then they weren't really qualified to participate anyway, so it's not really a net loss. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110924143052.ae80b146e4bbc48e91f93...@gmail.com
