* Don Armstrong (d...@debian.org) [110607 04:25]: > On Mon, 06 Jun 2011, Philipp Kern wrote: > > I.e. I think we should still allow non-buildd binaries, e.g. for > > those cases you mentioned. > > Non-buildd binaries should still be allowed, but they should be > followed immediately by a binNMU. [Are there any cases where we > wouldn't want to rebuild the package after it was bootstrapped?]
There are cases where porters need to upload, because of "funny" issues. Or hand-builds within sane buildd chroots where the buildd software refuses. Or similar. (I think I did less than 10 such uploads recently.) Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110607074538.gu15...@mails.so.argh.org
