Scott K. Ellis writes: > BTW, is there a particular reason that e2fsprogs got renamed to > e2fsprogsg? This seems to be the biggest chance to completely screw over > someone's system in all of Debian now.
Yes: e2fsprogs used to contain shared libs, on which dump and quota depend. Thus, e2fsprogs was assumed to be a package with libc5 libs, and I could not keep the name, without breaking dump and quota on a hamm upgrade. I thought that, e2fsprogsg being essential, would be flaged for installation as soon as it appears in the available packages. Is this not the case ? -- Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Stop making M$-Bill richer & richer, alt-email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | support Debian GNU/Linux: debian-email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | more powerful, more stable ! http://www.a2points.com/homepage/3475232 | ----------------------------------------- A computer engineer's looking for a job ! ----------------------------------------- -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
