[Tollef Fog Heen] > It seems quite inappropriate to limit this information to just a > single init system when we have more than one in Debian. We should > strive to move that information into a init-agnostic place, and I > don't see why it would be wrong to just have the relevant init > scripts Provide the relevant facility.
The simple issue is that this do not work with insserv, the first and as far as I have tested only system using the headers. I suspect that it would be better to list the provided virtual facilities in the scripts themselves, but believe it is a bad idea to do so until the LSB clearly state that this is the way that it should be done and insserv have been changed to handle it. I brought this topic up with the insserv upstream developers, but they believe it is a bad idea. Did not find time to work any more on the topic. A patch for insserv and a discussion within the LSB standardization framework would be a good way to bring this topic forward. :) Feel free to look into it if you got the spare time to spend on it. :) Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2fl1v7gdlg0....@login1.uio.no
