On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Jérémy Lal <kapo...@melix.org> wrote: > On 21/08/2010 15:00, Julien Cristau wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 14:23:19 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote: >> >>> But nodejs is getting more popular, and renaming its binary to nodejs >>> will probably upset many users. Is it legitimate to keep /usr/bin/node, >>> and Conflict: node ? >>> >> No, it's not. Best would be to convince your upstream to use a less >> generic name. > > I've tried once, without success, and now that's too late, > given the number of people and modules already using nodejs on other > platforms. > > BTW is /usr/bin/node and /usr/sbin/node really considered a conflict ? > i certainly see it as troublesome.
You could use the alternative system. ANd ask also upstream to x25 to change their binaries to x25node Bastien > Jérémy. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c6fd049.9020...@melix.org > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinxaggb76pjusdragvgnq=xse=3nhyd4odiy...@mail.gmail.com
