Am Dienstag 13 April 2010 20:11:34 schrieb Russ Allbery:
> Or are you saying that inetd implementations use IPV6_ADDRFORM before
> running the underlying program?  (All of the ones in Debian?)  If so,
> there's some missing connecting of the dots in your reply.

I guess not all of them. OTOH, not all of them might use AF_INET6 sockets for 
IPv4 connections (the two-sockets approach is always possible when using 
IPV6_V6ONLY socket option).

At least xinetd uses IPV6_ADDRFORM although that socket option is already 
deprecated again but still useful for such cases.

openbsd-inetd explicitely doesn't support IPv4-mapped addresses, configuration 
needs seperate IPv4 and IPv6 setup.

I didn't look at the other two.

HS


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201004140714.37690.p...@hendrik-sattler.de

Reply via email to