Am Dienstag 13 April 2010 20:11:34 schrieb Russ Allbery: > Or are you saying that inetd implementations use IPV6_ADDRFORM before > running the underlying program? (All of the ones in Debian?) If so, > there's some missing connecting of the dots in your reply.
I guess not all of them. OTOH, not all of them might use AF_INET6 sockets for IPv4 connections (the two-sockets approach is always possible when using IPV6_V6ONLY socket option). At least xinetd uses IPV6_ADDRFORM although that socket option is already deprecated again but still useful for such cases. openbsd-inetd explicitely doesn't support IPv4-mapped addresses, configuration needs seperate IPv4 and IPv6 setup. I didn't look at the other two. HS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201004140714.37690.p...@hendrik-sattler.de