Joey Hess <jo...@debian.org> wrote: > Joachim Wiedorn wrote: > > I still use CDBS and I use "simple-patches" - but now without CDBS > > support. My minor change is the file "patches/series" which let > > dpkg-buildpackages know that there are patches. This seems very simple, > > too. To get the old manner, I must only delete the series file and add > > the CDBS line into debian/rules. But remaining in format 3.0. > > > Because I never used quilt, the syntax for quilt is a little bit stupid > > for me. So also with the new format I don't use quilt. > > If I understand correctly what you're doing, you have a 3.0 (quilt) > package with no quilt managed patches, and using a debian/rules based No, I don't use an debian/rules based patch system. The patches will be used by dpkg-buildpackage because I have created the patches/series file. So inside dpkg the quilt-management of the patches will be used. But I don't use quilt outside the dpkg system.
> source package can be unpacked and the pre-patched source accessed > without needing to manually follow a README.source file. I also don't need any manually patching system. It is done by dpkg-buildpackage. Please try my package "xfe" for example and check whether it is the "perversion of the 3.0 format". Fondest regards, Joachim Wiedorn
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
