On Fri, Dec 04 2009, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@debian.org> wrote:
>> Nothing wrong with that. But when people are told to shut up
>> since Supe Speshul Sekrit discussions are going one betwen Really Ver
>> Important People, and the people partaking in the open discussions are
>> not important enough to be heard, well, that is a horse of a very
>> different color.
>
> They were asked to take it to private email - which is not the same as
> telling them to shut up.
Since it is shutting down public discussion, I fail to see the
distinction.
> Is there any reason to expect that anyone who wanted to join the
> off-list discussion would be excluded if they had sensible things to
> say?
How would I know about this so called discussion? What if I
might have things to add to it, after listening in for a bit? Who is
the target audience for suvh off list discussion? Only people who have
participated earlier? (I mean, I participated, and I have had no emails
sent to me. And I even contributed to the whole python policy thing --
one of the documents people were bandying about in an earlier
incarnation of this discussion was written by me).
manoj
--
The difference between us is not very far, cruising for burgers in
daddy's new car.
Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
