Zitat von Josselin Mouette <j...@debian.org>:
Le vendredi 04 septembre 2009 à 19:32 +0200, Hendrik Sattler a écrit :
It rather needs to raise the question why simple low-level tools
use something
like libglib?
I’d rather raise the question why each of our simple low-level tools
implement its data structures and basic routines in its own fashion,
leading to bugs and security issues sometimes, instead of re-using the
ones from Glib.
You mean useless functions like those only wrap standard functions and
add no value except a (build-)dependency to libglib? Very exciting.
There may be lots of useful stuff in libglib but some may only be
useful as portability wrapper (but some not even for that). Get rid of
all of those and I may agree. I fully disagree for using libglib as
wrapper around libc.
HS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
