Frank Küster wrote: > Luk Claes <l...@debian.org> wrote: > >> Norbert Preining wrote: >>> On Do, 04 Jun 2009, Luk Claes wrote: >>>> Except for arguing, mixing (non?) bugs and resisting to upload an easy >>>> workaround might have made things worse btw... >>> And that easy workaround would be??? >> To only conditionaly use a command that seems to not always be available. > > COULD YOU PLEASE START READING WHAT WE ARE WRITING?
Could you please do that from the start and not spread fud and shout all the time? > texlive-base's postrm, upon REMOVE, uses a command from tex-common, on > which it already DEPENDS. This is allowed by policy. Sure, though policy not describing what really happens will only make it a bug in policy AND your package... > The fact that in this particular chroot, texlive-base was installed > without tex-common being installed, or even unpacked, is NOT A BUG OF > tex-common. Sure it is. > It seems it is a bug of policy, or dpkg. Also true. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
