Luk Claes <l...@debian.org> wrote: > Norbert Preining wrote: >> On Do, 04 Jun 2009, Luk Claes wrote: >>> Except for arguing, mixing (non?) bugs and resisting to upload an easy >>> workaround might have made things worse btw... >> >> And that easy workaround would be??? > > To only conditionaly use a command that seems to not always be available.
COULD YOU PLEASE START READING WHAT WE ARE WRITING? texlive-base's postrm, upon REMOVE, uses a command from tex-common, on which it already DEPENDS. This is allowed by policy. The fact that in this particular chroot, texlive-base was installed without tex-common being installed, or even unpacked, is NOT A BUG OF tex-common. It seems it is a bug of policy, or dpkg. Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Debian Developer (TeXLive) VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
