On 06/04/09 at 19:48 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:13:45PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > > On Mon, 06 Apr 2009, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > I think that it is a good concept, but the linian warning has probably a > > > good > > > reason to exist. For instance, if a bug is closed as part of a "Team > > > upload", > > > won't the BTS expect a NMU acknowledgement anyway? > > > > IIRC that concept died when we introduced version tracking so it should > > cause any problem. Bugs are always version closed (and no more tagged > > fixed/fixed-in-nmu). > > Good :) Does it mean that the Developers Reference must be updated? > > Index: pkgs.dbk > =================================================================== > --- pkgs.dbk (revision 6668) > +++ pkgs.dbk (working copy) > @@ -2073,13 +2073,6 @@ > work on it. > </para> > > -<para> > -To acknowledge an NMU, include its changes and changelog entry in your next > -maintainer upload. If you do not acknowledge the NMU by including the > -NMU changelog entry in your changelog, the bugs will remain closed in the > -BTS but will be listed as affecting your maintainer version of the package. > -</para> > - > </section> > > <section id="nmu-binnmu">
No, that's still correct. If you don't include the changelog entry fixing the bug, then the BTS' version tracking will be confused, and think that your version still has the bug. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
