On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Marco d'Itri <m...@linux.it> wrote: > On Mar 19, Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bast...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> It is the same probleme with floppy, tty and disk group. > No, it's not. > >> They should add this group to their ldap database. At least it should > This would not change anything. > >> be documented that debian system need this group. BTW redhat has also >> rdma, fuse, kvm group. > And recently removed them from the udev rules. > > If you have no clue about the issue being discussed you have no > obligation to partecipate to the thread, you know?
First I was not offencive with you, so you please could you keep a nice and peaceful thread. Secondly, I use Unix for a long time, and last time I checked redhat used kvm group. May be I am not up to date as you say, but please keep the thread peaceful. Moreover I respectfully disagree with you.? Permission on device file should be from a security point of view, permission should respect the minimum privileges principle. Therefore daemon using /dev/fuse should be able only to use /dev/kvm and not /dev/fuse. You could note also that for instance Josselin mouette respectfully disagree with you. So please keep this thread quiet. I have the right to disagree with you, and you have the right to think I am a sucker but please keep it private at least. Best regard Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
