Hi Charles, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 08:40:12PM -0600, Raphael Geissert a écrit : >> >> I of course do not want to say that reviewing packages in -mentors is always >> useless, but here again we need to deal with yet another social problem which >> is the lack of willingness by some people to work on their package to get it >> in shape. > > Hi Raphael, > > I think that the workflow on -mentors does not discourage enough maintainers > from working alone. Co-maintainance, work in a packaging team and use of VCS > should be more often proposed after ITPs are filed (and of course, ITPs should > be filed earlier). Yes, I've seen some of those as well; those make me happy, actually. It is always nice to work with someone who is willing to keep working to get it the best way as possible. I love that. That reminds me that another problem (probably the original source of these issues) is that the documentation is not explicit enough or doesn't say all it needs to/should say. And before anyone tells me to stop complaining instead of working on it: I will, I just have too many items on my todo list that should be done before. > > Have a nice day, > Cheers, Raphael Geissert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
