On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 09:25:43AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Wednesday 03 December 2008 23:46, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > Some archs have already problems keeping up > > [citation needed]
> :-) > http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph-quarter-big.png First, that graph isn't a measure of how the buildds are keeping up. It measures what percentage of packages are built on each architecture, which basically means it's a measure of how well-ported Debian is to those archs (and/or how well the P-a-s entries are being maintained for those archs). Second, there isn't actually anything on that graph (or on the graph that /does/ give a better measure how well the buildds are keeping up, http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph2-quarter-big.png) to indicate the archs are having problems. There are actually "warning" lines configured for those graphs, as you can see from <http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph2-big.png>; and all archs have been far enough above the thresholds for the past quarter that the lines themselves are cut off below the bottom of the graph. So I don't think we have archs that are struggling to keep up right now, except during exceptional periods when they have zero buildds on-line. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
