On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 02:37:39PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > [Steve Langasek] > >> The s390 buildd maintainer presumes to mark all packages as > >> 'Not-for-us' if he doesn't feel like building them for the arch, > >> without bothering to reach a consensus first together with the > >> maintainer, the ftp masters, or the maintainers of the P-a-s > >> overrides. > > > > Is the unilateral flagging of not-for-us being addressed in any way? > > Similar the ia64 buildd admin, see #464932. Or is there anything I could > do myself about this?
That package is only n-f-u on s390, it's in p-a-s for some other architectures. It seems to indeed FTBFS on a couple of architectures, so why do you think the p-a-s is wrong? Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
