(please do _not_ CC me :) Il giorno Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:17:30 +0100 Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 12:51:46PM +0100, David Paleino wrote: > > > Ok, then. Is translate-bin a right choice? Or is that too generic? > > Since -bin in itself is generic, too (after all, it could probably be > appended to all programs), the result is as generic as the both parts ;) I suspected that :) (it was just for uniformity -- *buntu users have that program named translate-bin) > Making a name less generic requires either qualifying it with some kind > of detail (e.g. gnome-, k, g, qt for the desktop environments and > toolkits) or better yet choose a name that has nothing to do with its > use (e.g. iceweasel). Well, this tool is used from CLI, thus has nothing to do with GNOME, KDE, Xfce, *. I might think of another name, but... isn't this upstream's job? :) > If you want to keep the name close to the library name, you could > probably choose something like libtranslate-bin, although I personaly > find that ugly. Me too, that's awful. I'll contact upstream, let's see what he thinks. Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
