On Sat, 05 Jan 2008, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > On la, 2008-01-05 at 13:43 +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > As you might expect (as I was the requester for this feature) I'd > > *really* prefer the former option. My initial reasoning for it is that > > I want to make it immediately visible to sponsors if a package has > > suppressed lintian warnings. If it's not the default behaviour to list > > them, then I'd be worried that some people just won't notice. > > This might be too much DWIM, but... supposed lintian would, by default, > report the number of suppressed warnings, but only if the person running > it is not the maintainer? Lintian could use the same logic for > determining the name/address as dch does.
I like that. :) So if DEBEMAIL/EMAIL doesn't match Maintainer/Uploaders then you get to see the N: lines. > Additionally, there should then be options like > --never-summarize-overrides and --always-summarize-overrides. Indeed. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
