Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, 05 Jan 2008, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>> This might be too much DWIM, but... supposed lintian would, by default, >> report the number of suppressed warnings, but only if the person >> running it is not the maintainer? Lintian could use the same logic for >> determining the name/address as dch does. > I like that. :) > > So if DEBEMAIL/EMAIL doesn't match Maintainer/Uploaders then you get to > see the N: lines. I'm afraid this would require a significant restructuring of lintian's code and isn't really viable for the next release. The part of lintian that is in a position to warn about overrides doesn't have any idea who the maintainer is. It will be easier in the future, so I could revisit this later. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
